Final Show

http://www.slideshare.net/seanmmosher/how-to-analyze-literature-by-sean-mosher

Blog Post #7

Only after eight week of school I feel that I have learn a lot.  I have especially learn a lot when writing analytical essays.  I now know the difference between analyzing essays and summarizing them.  I think my expectation of English 102 have been meet, and I think I have meet the expectation of what is expected from a English 102 student.  The most challenge I have had in this class is definitely essay #3.  The reason I had trouble with this essay is because I found it difficult to try to relate two different peoples lives with one event that went on in history and also trying to find evidence that ties all theses things together.  Overall this has been a good learning experience that I can use in the future.



.

Blog #6

Kevin J Wetmore Jr. Theatre Journal. Washington: May 2006.Vol. 58, Iss. 2;  pg. 358, 2 pgs. Yavapai College. 15 July 2011

I am planning to use this site to show the military backround of Sean Huze.  The reason I want to use the background of Sean Huze is so I can show reasons why he decided to write this play.  Also with this site I will grasp a better understand of his life.




Chaudhry, Lakshmi. "A Soldier Speaks: Sean Huze | World | AlterNet." Home | AlterNet. Web. 17 July 2011. <http://www.alternet.org/world/20358/?page=2>.

This site is a interview with Sean Huze.  Here he talks about his feeling on The Sandstorm.  What he went through in the Iraqi War and how he feels about the U.S soldiers being there.  I'm going to use this site to make my essay stronger by talking about day to day events Sean Huze went through in this war.

Blog Post #5

            “He was a citizen and a soldier”(125,O’Brien).  Out of all the passage we were able to read I choose to write about “The Man I Killed”.  It is a short passage in the novel  The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien.  This passage really caught my attention because O’Brien decided to repeat himself three times.  When the main character looked at this man’s body, who he just killed, he saw just a normal person.  He saw a man who had dreams of being a Mathematician.  I believe the main character saw a normal citizen just like him, who had to go to war, who had dreams and had a family waiting for him at home.  Throughout the passage this man realized how small the body was,  I think he felt terrible for taking this man’s life away.  He was a small Vietnamese man who never was violent and was picked on for having such a dainty figure.  Even though the main characters friend told him that it was going to be alright, he knew it wasn’t alright.  The main character possibly could have seen himself laying their dead.  This was probably the first man he has ever killed, I believes this because Tim O’Brien repeats himself about how mangled this body is.  I definitely enjoyed this passage, and when I get a better understanding for it maybe then ill be able to understand why O’Brien continues to repeat himself.

http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/modules/vietnam/index.cfm

Blog Post #4

Blog Post #4

           

             When comparing both these stories to the poems I wrote about last week, I noticed a lot of similarities.  I also noticed a bigger similarity between the two essays that I read.  After reading both essays I came to the conclusion that both writers enjoy writing about depressing things that happened and that is happening in the world we live in.  These writers wrote about some of the same stuff such as, World War 2.  The difference between both these writers in my opinion is that Sam Himill used more factual evidence and statistics than Carolyn Forche essay. Sam also had some experience when he talked about people being incarcerated and how it feels to be locked away.  He also talked about being a Marine and what is expected from you.  When I compare these essays to the poem I wrote about I noticed some similarities.  I wrote my essay on the poem called “Letter Composed During a Lull in the Fighting”. This poem was about love and how this soldier misses the love of his life.  Obviously this poem and Sam’s essay are related because they both wrote about being in the Military.  Also all three pieces of writing were depression and had no happy or cheerful moment throughout all the writing I read. 

            I agree with everything they had to talk about.  Most was factual evidence that you can’t argue with or it was writing about emotion.  I don’t think I can agree or disagree when it comes to matters of emotion because some people try not to have any emotion at all and others wear there feeling on there selves.  But I can understand some of the emotion they were feeling or the reasons why they felt that way.  All in all I didn’t really enjoy the writings but I enjoyed the poem.